smaram1
05-17 09:56 AM
lunar...check ur pm..i forwarded email...eom
wallpaper Tags: Desktop Wallpaper
waiting4gc
09-06 12:57 AM
I am so pained reading these posts. I thought I was unlucky, having been here since 8/8/99 and now getting my gc. I see people from 1994 without green card. This is just BS. I will continue to support this org due to what I have gained (July 2nd filer). This is a great org and hopefully everyone will get their gcs soon may it be eb2/3. Lets keep it going guys, its all about numbers.
ajju
02-07 11:07 PM
These rebates are based on 2007 Tax year.
If you have ITIN for Tax year 2006 and file your taxes for 2007 with SSN (After one got EAD and applied for SSN), then those people should be good to go.
I hope i am not missing anything.
Thanks.
My 2 cents...
Most of the July filers will have SSN, so no issue... Even ITIN (legal dependents) should also be fine per my understanding.. as ITIN is not eligible for work by nature.. So illegals don't need ITIN.. They either have fraud SSNs or nothing at all... In 2001, my married friends with wife did get family rebate of $600... So I am hopeful for H4 folks this time also...
If you have ITIN for Tax year 2006 and file your taxes for 2007 with SSN (After one got EAD and applied for SSN), then those people should be good to go.
I hope i am not missing anything.
Thanks.
My 2 cents...
Most of the July filers will have SSN, so no issue... Even ITIN (legal dependents) should also be fine per my understanding.. as ITIN is not eligible for work by nature.. So illegals don't need ITIN.. They either have fraud SSNs or nothing at all... In 2001, my married friends with wife did get family rebate of $600... So I am hopeful for H4 folks this time also...
2011 Fred Perry by Amy Winehouse
Ramba
10-24 03:35 PM
Here is a good material to read..If someone plan to do, I am also interested.
http://www.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/immigration/pdfs/web885.pdf
http://www.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/immigration/pdfs/web885.pdf
more...
rsdang
07-30 02:08 PM
Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) - Lady who took the call said he will support the bill
Howard L. Berman (D-CA) - Guy took the message and said he will pass the message on
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) - Said "he" supports it
Maxine Waters (D-CA) - Guy took the message and said he will pass the message on
Bill Delahunt (D-MA) - Lady who took the call said she will let the congressman know
Linda T. Sanchez (D-CA) - Lady who took the call said she will let the congresswoman know
Artur Davis (D-AL) - Lady who took the call said she will let the congressman know and that she did not know how he will vote.
Keith Ellison (D-MN) - She said she did not know how he is going to vote and she will pass the message. Also said you can guess which way he will vote as he has a large immigrant community in his district
Anthony Weiner (D-NY) 202-225-6616 - He said he will pass the message on and did not know how he is going to vote.
Minority Members (Republicans)
Steve King (R-IA) [Ranking Member] - He said the congressman opposes it and I pressed on him to reconsider as there is a strong immigrant community in IA ( mainly professionals who would appreciate his support)
Elton Gallegly (R-CA) - she said she would be happy to pass the message along
Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) - She said she doesnt know position and will pass the message
Dan Lungren (R-CA) - She said she doesnt know position and will pass the message
J. Randy Forbes (R-VA) - she said she will pass the message and did not know the position
Louie Gohmert (R-TX) - Will pass the message and was not sure how the congressman plans to vote
:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:mad::mad::mad::mad:
CALL TO ACTION -
If we have an Iowa chapter - please mobalize your team to call Congressman King. He will listen to his vote bank.
Every one else - please call - its not that hard ( specially for highly qualified professionals...)
Howard L. Berman (D-CA) - Guy took the message and said he will pass the message on
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) - Said "he" supports it
Maxine Waters (D-CA) - Guy took the message and said he will pass the message on
Bill Delahunt (D-MA) - Lady who took the call said she will let the congressman know
Linda T. Sanchez (D-CA) - Lady who took the call said she will let the congresswoman know
Artur Davis (D-AL) - Lady who took the call said she will let the congressman know and that she did not know how he will vote.
Keith Ellison (D-MN) - She said she did not know how he is going to vote and she will pass the message. Also said you can guess which way he will vote as he has a large immigrant community in his district
Anthony Weiner (D-NY) 202-225-6616 - He said he will pass the message on and did not know how he is going to vote.
Minority Members (Republicans)
Steve King (R-IA) [Ranking Member] - He said the congressman opposes it and I pressed on him to reconsider as there is a strong immigrant community in IA ( mainly professionals who would appreciate his support)
Elton Gallegly (R-CA) - she said she would be happy to pass the message along
Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) - She said she doesnt know position and will pass the message
Dan Lungren (R-CA) - She said she doesnt know position and will pass the message
J. Randy Forbes (R-VA) - she said she will pass the message and did not know the position
Louie Gohmert (R-TX) - Will pass the message and was not sure how the congressman plans to vote
:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:mad::mad::mad::mad:
CALL TO ACTION -
If we have an Iowa chapter - please mobalize your team to call Congressman King. He will listen to his vote bank.
Every one else - please call - its not that hard ( specially for highly qualified professionals...)
sanju_dba
08-05 01:05 PM
2k increase in fees , i guess employers dont care and shouldnt care. this will help their ( USCIS ) infrastructure to grow and help process the application faster.
if companies cannot apply for more work authorizations because of 50-50, would'nt they popup more small sized companies?
if companies cannot apply for more work authorizations because of 50-50, would'nt they popup more small sized companies?
more...
njboy
09-25 02:19 PM
the recapture from coryn is not dead...sa 2143 is waiting to be amended to the defence appropriations bill..and the sa 2283 h1b killer is an amendment to this amendment.
2010 amy jackson wallpapers
cool_desi_gc
11-11 05:59 AM
Andy...my center is NSC...My AP is approved only after i took an INFOPASS. Maybe it is a coincidence.
more...
gclongwaytogo
10-15 09:36 AM
July 2nd
Triviagal
GCFISH
rexjamla
BU007
nkavjs
jsb
gc_us
srinitls
realraghu
vg1778
mahendra_t
Satya
smshen
dreamworld
ashokK
gcbroomfield
helpme1234
cowboy
Jignesh
ultrasparc
i99
Bayboy
nk2007
zdong
HNaik
vikramy
alkg
maru
logene
ash_2004
kish006
JULY 3RD
i99
helpme1234
kingnaga
waitforgc123
cool_cat
GKBest
greener_pasture
July 5th
chalamcharla
mbsac
July 9th
krustycat
July 11
jthomas
July 13
gcnm04
July 16
viveckj99
gcspace
fetch_gc
July 17th
Sunx_2004
July 19th
Rag_1970
jULY
vrbes
July 30th
Wait4ever
August 2nd
PVPB
August 03rd
ttdam
mita
Triviagal
GCFISH
rexjamla
BU007
nkavjs
jsb
gc_us
srinitls
realraghu
vg1778
mahendra_t
Satya
smshen
dreamworld
ashokK
gcbroomfield
helpme1234
cowboy
Jignesh
ultrasparc
i99
Bayboy
nk2007
zdong
HNaik
vikramy
alkg
maru
logene
ash_2004
kish006
JULY 3RD
i99
helpme1234
kingnaga
waitforgc123
cool_cat
GKBest
greener_pasture
July 5th
chalamcharla
mbsac
July 9th
krustycat
July 11
jthomas
July 13
gcnm04
July 16
viveckj99
gcspace
fetch_gc
July 17th
Sunx_2004
July 19th
Rag_1970
jULY
vrbes
July 30th
Wait4ever
August 2nd
PVPB
August 03rd
ttdam
mita
hair Amy Winehouse 1280X1024
gcformeornot
09-28 03:11 PM
too. I changed my PD close to current visa bulletin. I changed category to EB2
FOIA calculation was realistic Aug2010. But USCIS calculation was way off something like Aug2012 :confused:
FOIA calculation was realistic Aug2010. But USCIS calculation was way off something like Aug2012 :confused:
more...
asiehouston
06-19 06:05 PM
Hello Kodak57,
I dont have a Birth Certificate and the Certificate of unavailability is next to impossible to get from the Local Muncipal Corp.
I do have 2 Affedevits 1from my parents and second from my uncle stating that the record of birth is unavailable and that i was born on a specified date etc.
Would the affedevits along with a School leaving certificate work?
Many thanks for your help.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contributed so far $100
I dont have a Birth Certificate and the Certificate of unavailability is next to impossible to get from the Local Muncipal Corp.
I do have 2 Affedevits 1from my parents and second from my uncle stating that the record of birth is unavailable and that i was born on a specified date etc.
Would the affedevits along with a School leaving certificate work?
Many thanks for your help.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contributed so far $100
hot amy winehouse wallpaper - 85814. Overall Rating:
unitednations
12-10 06:10 PM
Mr. UN
what you think is the best course of action for people. I agree that EAD is not GC.
Would you say some is better off or worse off switching from a smaller company to a bigger company.
The problem is that different service centers treat issues differently. Your 140 could have been decided by texas which is easier on education. however, 140's and 485's are being transferred to service centers which have jurisdiction over your employment and/or place of residence. Therefore, if your 485 is in nebraska; but 140 was approved in texas; the 140 will get re-looked at again by nebraska. if it doesn't meet nebraska standards or somehow the interpretation gets changed before you get greencard then your 140 could be in trouble.
in my local office interview; officer did mention how he had revoked an I-140 that was approved by texas service center.
Now;if you leave your employer and start using EAd and six years is finished and something happens to 140 or 485 then you are really out of luck. However; if you stay on h-1b and 140 is revoked; the remaining time on h-1b i-94 card will still be good. It will give you a chance to get another greencard process going before your h-1b would come up for renewal.
Many, many times; consultants do not know the overall picture of the company. You guys don't know the details of the labor; how many 140's have been filed, revoked, department of labor investigations; visa refusals; irs audits; company guys selling the company, etc; all of these variables can impact your greencard (ac21 is not the be all, end all that all people think). If you have left the employer after 180 days but a few years later; uscis adds up all cases together and gives company choice of which cases they want left alone; they will not pick yours because you have left. If that is the case; then that means there was never ability to pay for your particular case and it was approved in error.
I know some people who it took 10 years to get greencard. They got burned before and then they played it very conservative until it got approved. However, the very same day it got approved; they start asking of when they can leave the employer. My advice is always; it took you so long and why become a risk taker at probably the most sensitive time. Even when you get the greencard approved; company keeps filing h1b's, labors, 140's, etc.; everytime uscis touches company petition; it gives them a chance to go through the whole history of the company. These things are all going on behind the scense that you don't even know about.
Regarding ; moving to a bigger company. Even if you move to a smaller company but you are getting paid the labor wage then uscis will leave the new companies legitimacy alone. However; if you just show a letter from ac21 employer and you haven't gotten paid from them yet; then that is a whole different ball game.
what you think is the best course of action for people. I agree that EAD is not GC.
Would you say some is better off or worse off switching from a smaller company to a bigger company.
The problem is that different service centers treat issues differently. Your 140 could have been decided by texas which is easier on education. however, 140's and 485's are being transferred to service centers which have jurisdiction over your employment and/or place of residence. Therefore, if your 485 is in nebraska; but 140 was approved in texas; the 140 will get re-looked at again by nebraska. if it doesn't meet nebraska standards or somehow the interpretation gets changed before you get greencard then your 140 could be in trouble.
in my local office interview; officer did mention how he had revoked an I-140 that was approved by texas service center.
Now;if you leave your employer and start using EAd and six years is finished and something happens to 140 or 485 then you are really out of luck. However; if you stay on h-1b and 140 is revoked; the remaining time on h-1b i-94 card will still be good. It will give you a chance to get another greencard process going before your h-1b would come up for renewal.
Many, many times; consultants do not know the overall picture of the company. You guys don't know the details of the labor; how many 140's have been filed, revoked, department of labor investigations; visa refusals; irs audits; company guys selling the company, etc; all of these variables can impact your greencard (ac21 is not the be all, end all that all people think). If you have left the employer after 180 days but a few years later; uscis adds up all cases together and gives company choice of which cases they want left alone; they will not pick yours because you have left. If that is the case; then that means there was never ability to pay for your particular case and it was approved in error.
I know some people who it took 10 years to get greencard. They got burned before and then they played it very conservative until it got approved. However, the very same day it got approved; they start asking of when they can leave the employer. My advice is always; it took you so long and why become a risk taker at probably the most sensitive time. Even when you get the greencard approved; company keeps filing h1b's, labors, 140's, etc.; everytime uscis touches company petition; it gives them a chance to go through the whole history of the company. These things are all going on behind the scense that you don't even know about.
Regarding ; moving to a bigger company. Even if you move to a smaller company but you are getting paid the labor wage then uscis will leave the new companies legitimacy alone. However; if you just show a letter from ac21 employer and you haven't gotten paid from them yet; then that is a whole different ball game.
more...
house Amy Winehouse Wallpapers
pappu
03-11 07:33 PM
Contributing since IV started 2005, had access till 2008 and lost access in 2009 and 2010
Please give me access ASAP.
Please send us an email with your latest contribution details and we will verify and provide access
Please give me access ASAP.
Please send us an email with your latest contribution details and we will verify and provide access
tattoo mighty boosh wallpaper.
msyedy
12-05 08:41 PM
Mr Khodlamd...
See that ... What did I predict. This is a Lazy Congress, they are not even working on the spending bills, why would they take up EB.
Business Community cannot effect them.
Let us pray that we see the next year as a prosperous year for EB.
Pray...
See that ... What did I predict. This is a Lazy Congress, they are not even working on the spending bills, why would they take up EB.
Business Community cannot effect them.
Let us pray that we see the next year as a prosperous year for EB.
Pray...
more...
pictures amy winehouse amy winehouse
sankap
01-18 11:43 PM
It's true to a large extent that there aren't many Indian scientists/doctors/engineers with original research published in peer-reviewed journals. Besides the educational infrastructure (or lack thereof) in India, not many students opt for a career in research, given the middle-class Indians' propensity to take up a job or pursue MBA/IAS almost immediately after getting their first degrees. Similarly, Indians' contributions are very few in disciplines like arts, philosophy, psychology, social sciences, history, and law--simply because many of us consider those fields "inferior" back home. In fact, according to the following article in The Economist, Bangalore is not another Silicon Valley yet (notwithstanding that India produces some of the world's best programmers):
http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10286645
Also, an excellent NYT article on the state of schools in India ("India’s schools have sunk to spectacularly low levels..."):
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/world/asia/17india.html?ex=1358398800&en=b6f5288fa7d43d39&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10286645
Also, an excellent NYT article on the state of schools in India ("India’s schools have sunk to spectacularly low levels..."):
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/world/asia/17india.html?ex=1358398800&en=b6f5288fa7d43d39&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
dresses Amy Winehouse Smoking Pictures
arnab221
09-25 03:14 PM
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.--Paragraph (1) shall take effect for applications filed at least 30 days after the creation of the list described in paragraph (2).
(d) H-1B Nonimmigrants Not Admitted for Jobs Advertised or Offered Only to H-1B Nonimmigrants.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(1) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:
``(H)(i) The employer has not advertised the available jobs specified in the application in an advertisement that states or indicates that--
``(I) the job or jobs are only available to persons who are or who may become H-1B nonimmigrants; or
``(II) persons who are or who may become H-1B nonimmigrants shall receive priority or a preference in the hiring process.
``(ii) The employer has not only recruited persons who are, or who may become, H-1B nonimmigrants to fill the job or jobs.''; and
(2) in the undesignated paragraph at the end, by striking ``The employer'' and inserting the following:
``(K) The employer''.
(e) Prohibition of Outplacement.--
(1) IN GENERAL.--Section 212(n) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(A) in paragraph (1), by amending subparagraph (F) to read as follows:
``(F) The employer shall not place, outsource, lease, or otherwise contract for the placement of an alien admitted or provided status as an H-1B nonimmigrant with another employer;'' and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (E).
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall apply to applications filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Limit on Percentage of H-1B Employees.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended by inserting after subparagraph (H), as added by subsection (d)(1), the following:
``(I) If the employer employs not less than 50 employees in the United States, not more than 50 percent of such employees are H-1B nonimmigrants.''.
(g) Wage Determination.--
(1) CHANGE IN MINIMUM WAGES.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows:
``(A) The employer--
``(i) is offering and will offer, during the period of authorized employment, to aliens admitted or provided status as an H-1B nonimmigrant, wages, based on the best information available at the time the application is filed, which are not less than the highest of--
``(I) the locally determined prevailing wage level for the occupational classification in the area of employment;
``(II) the median average wage for all workers in the occupational classification in the area of employment; or
``(III) the median wage for skill level 2 in the occupational classification found in the most recent Occupational Employment Statistics survey; and
``(ii) will provide working conditions for such a nonimmigrant that will not adversely affect the working conditions of workers similarly employed.''; and
(B) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ``the wage determination methodology used under subparagraph (A)(i),'' after ``shall contain''.
(2) PROVISION OF W-2 FORMS.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act is amended by inserting after subparagraph (I), as added by subsection (f), the following:
``(J) If the employer, in such previous period as the Secretary shall specify, employed 1 or more H-1B nonimmigrants, the employer shall submit to the Secretary the Internal Revenue Service Form W-2 Wage and Tax Statement filed by the employer with respect to such nonimmigrants for such period.''.
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to applications filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(h) Immigration Documents.--Section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(l) Employer To Share All Immigration Paperwork Exchanged With Federal Agencies.--Not later than 10 working days after receiving a written request from a former, current, or future employee or beneficiary, an employer shall provide the employee or beneficiary with the original (or a certified copy of the original) of all petitions, notices, and other written communication exchanged between the employer and the Department of Labor, the Department of Homeland Security, or any other Federal agency that is related to an immigrant or nonimmigrant petition filed by the employer for the employee or beneficiary.''.
SEC. 3303. H-1B GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Safeguards Against Fraud and Misrepresentation in Application Review Process.--Section 212(n)(1)(K) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as redesignated by section 3302 (d)(2), is amended--
(1) by inserting ``and through the Department of Labor's website, without charge.'' after ``D.C.'';
(2) by inserting ``, clear indicators of fraud, misrepresentation of material fact,'' after ``completeness'';
(3) by striking ``or obviously inaccurate'' and inserting ``, presents clear indicators of fraud or misrepresentation of material fact, or is obviously inaccurate'';
(4) by striking ``within 7 days of'' and inserting ``not later than 14 days after''; and
(5) by adding at the end the following: ``If the Secretary's review of an application identifies clear indicators of fraud or misrepresentation of material fact, the Secretary may conduct an investigation and hearing under paragraph (2).
(b) Investigations by Department of Labor.--Section 212(n)(2) of such Act is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A)--
(A) by striking ``12 months'' and inserting ``24 months''; and
(B) by striking ``The Secretary shall conduct'' and all that follows and inserting ``Upon the receipt of such a complaint, the Secretary may initiate an investigation to determine if such a failure or misrepresentation has occurred.'';
(2) in subparagraph (C)(i)--
(A) by striking ``a condition of paragraph (1)(B), (1)(E), or (1)(F)'' and inserting ``a condition under subparagraph (B), (C)(i), (E), (F), (H), (I), or (J) of paragraph (1)''; and
(B) by striking ``(1)(C)'' and inserting ``(1)(C)(ii)'';
(3) in subparagraph (G)--
(A) in clause (i), by striking ``if the Secretary'' and all that follows and inserting ``with regard to the employer's compliance with the requirements of this subsection.'';
(B) in clause (ii), by striking ``and whose identity'' and all that follows through ``failure or failures.'' and inserting ``the Secretary of Labor may conduct an investigation into the employer's compliance with the requirements of this subsection.'';
(C) in clause (iii), by striking the last sentence;
(d) H-1B Nonimmigrants Not Admitted for Jobs Advertised or Offered Only to H-1B Nonimmigrants.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(1) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:
``(H)(i) The employer has not advertised the available jobs specified in the application in an advertisement that states or indicates that--
``(I) the job or jobs are only available to persons who are or who may become H-1B nonimmigrants; or
``(II) persons who are or who may become H-1B nonimmigrants shall receive priority or a preference in the hiring process.
``(ii) The employer has not only recruited persons who are, or who may become, H-1B nonimmigrants to fill the job or jobs.''; and
(2) in the undesignated paragraph at the end, by striking ``The employer'' and inserting the following:
``(K) The employer''.
(e) Prohibition of Outplacement.--
(1) IN GENERAL.--Section 212(n) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(A) in paragraph (1), by amending subparagraph (F) to read as follows:
``(F) The employer shall not place, outsource, lease, or otherwise contract for the placement of an alien admitted or provided status as an H-1B nonimmigrant with another employer;'' and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (E).
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall apply to applications filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Limit on Percentage of H-1B Employees.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended by inserting after subparagraph (H), as added by subsection (d)(1), the following:
``(I) If the employer employs not less than 50 employees in the United States, not more than 50 percent of such employees are H-1B nonimmigrants.''.
(g) Wage Determination.--
(1) CHANGE IN MINIMUM WAGES.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act, as amended by this section, is further amended--
(A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows:
``(A) The employer--
``(i) is offering and will offer, during the period of authorized employment, to aliens admitted or provided status as an H-1B nonimmigrant, wages, based on the best information available at the time the application is filed, which are not less than the highest of--
``(I) the locally determined prevailing wage level for the occupational classification in the area of employment;
``(II) the median average wage for all workers in the occupational classification in the area of employment; or
``(III) the median wage for skill level 2 in the occupational classification found in the most recent Occupational Employment Statistics survey; and
``(ii) will provide working conditions for such a nonimmigrant that will not adversely affect the working conditions of workers similarly employed.''; and
(B) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ``the wage determination methodology used under subparagraph (A)(i),'' after ``shall contain''.
(2) PROVISION OF W-2 FORMS.--Section 212(n)(1) of such Act is amended by inserting after subparagraph (I), as added by subsection (f), the following:
``(J) If the employer, in such previous period as the Secretary shall specify, employed 1 or more H-1B nonimmigrants, the employer shall submit to the Secretary the Internal Revenue Service Form W-2 Wage and Tax Statement filed by the employer with respect to such nonimmigrants for such period.''.
(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to applications filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(h) Immigration Documents.--Section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(l) Employer To Share All Immigration Paperwork Exchanged With Federal Agencies.--Not later than 10 working days after receiving a written request from a former, current, or future employee or beneficiary, an employer shall provide the employee or beneficiary with the original (or a certified copy of the original) of all petitions, notices, and other written communication exchanged between the employer and the Department of Labor, the Department of Homeland Security, or any other Federal agency that is related to an immigrant or nonimmigrant petition filed by the employer for the employee or beneficiary.''.
SEC. 3303. H-1B GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Safeguards Against Fraud and Misrepresentation in Application Review Process.--Section 212(n)(1)(K) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as redesignated by section 3302 (d)(2), is amended--
(1) by inserting ``and through the Department of Labor's website, without charge.'' after ``D.C.'';
(2) by inserting ``, clear indicators of fraud, misrepresentation of material fact,'' after ``completeness'';
(3) by striking ``or obviously inaccurate'' and inserting ``, presents clear indicators of fraud or misrepresentation of material fact, or is obviously inaccurate'';
(4) by striking ``within 7 days of'' and inserting ``not later than 14 days after''; and
(5) by adding at the end the following: ``If the Secretary's review of an application identifies clear indicators of fraud or misrepresentation of material fact, the Secretary may conduct an investigation and hearing under paragraph (2).
(b) Investigations by Department of Labor.--Section 212(n)(2) of such Act is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A)--
(A) by striking ``12 months'' and inserting ``24 months''; and
(B) by striking ``The Secretary shall conduct'' and all that follows and inserting ``Upon the receipt of such a complaint, the Secretary may initiate an investigation to determine if such a failure or misrepresentation has occurred.'';
(2) in subparagraph (C)(i)--
(A) by striking ``a condition of paragraph (1)(B), (1)(E), or (1)(F)'' and inserting ``a condition under subparagraph (B), (C)(i), (E), (F), (H), (I), or (J) of paragraph (1)''; and
(B) by striking ``(1)(C)'' and inserting ``(1)(C)(ii)'';
(3) in subparagraph (G)--
(A) in clause (i), by striking ``if the Secretary'' and all that follows and inserting ``with regard to the employer's compliance with the requirements of this subsection.'';
(B) in clause (ii), by striking ``and whose identity'' and all that follows through ``failure or failures.'' and inserting ``the Secretary of Labor may conduct an investigation into the employer's compliance with the requirements of this subsection.'';
(C) in clause (iii), by striking the last sentence;
more...
makeup Amy Winehouse 0024 1600X1200
sircaustic
11-20 09:50 AM
man...i can understand the pain...easy... Saturday will be too soon. if they mail on 11/18 you may get it on saturday else 2-5 business days... many its from 1st cpo date but in your case it might be different. any ones guess is my best guess.
During our Infopass appointment yesterday, we insisted on speaking with a supervisor. He was also no help. All he kept repeating was the case has been approved and the card was in production but he won't be able to issue a letter or an Interim EAD. USCIS has completely done away with those. No changes in status since the first CPO email. Looks like we are in for a long wait. At the moment, my wife can wave a buh' bye to this job and start looking around all over again...it is extremely disappointing.
During our Infopass appointment yesterday, we insisted on speaking with a supervisor. He was also no help. All he kept repeating was the case has been approved and the card was in production but he won't be able to issue a letter or an Interim EAD. USCIS has completely done away with those. No changes in status since the first CPO email. Looks like we are in for a long wait. At the moment, my wife can wave a buh' bye to this job and start looking around all over again...it is extremely disappointing.
girlfriend wallpaper amy winehouse no
prdgl
05-24 11:13 PM
HOW ABOUT Thread.run()
I think its Thread.Start() not Thread.Run()
I think its Thread.Start() not Thread.Run()
hairstyles Amy Winehouse Wallpapers
i_aged_out
04-03 03:53 AM
One thing that most people here do not understand is that Universities have only two different categories for both admissions and Financial Aid: GC or Citizens get normal treatment. Everyone else, whether they are on AOS or H4 or any other status are considered International Students both in selection process and for Financial Aid. It is very simple - International Students are Not Eligible for Any Financial Aid. They will have to pay Full Fee, which is about 50k/yr in good Universities.
If DREAM Act covers Legal Kids, it will cover those in AOS too, which will enable them to get GC before their parents do and be eligible for selection as a local and for the Financial Aid that locals (GC and Citizens) are eligible.
Getting admission in good Universities is extremely difficult as an International Student as they tend to have a separate quota for international students, even though they refuse to admit publicly that they have such quotas.
I know these because my son went through all this last year.
Very well explained ! Couldn't have said it any better !
If DREAM Act covers Legal Kids, it will cover those in AOS too, which will enable them to get GC before their parents do and be eligible for selection as a local and for the Financial Aid that locals (GC and Citizens) are eligible.
Getting admission in good Universities is extremely difficult as an International Student as they tend to have a separate quota for international students, even though they refuse to admit publicly that they have such quotas.
I know these because my son went through all this last year.
Very well explained ! Couldn't have said it any better !
rameshvaid
07-24 10:52 AM
Hi,
I was able to access last week. But now my access is revoked. can some one look into it?
Same with me too..
RV
I was able to access last week. But now my access is revoked. can some one look into it?
Same with me too..
RV
Brightsider
04-21 10:25 AM
Colorado State Govt. considering this bill and have mejority in state republican and democrats to pass the law that will allow illigal immigrants to be eligible for in-state tuition.
http://www.today.colostate.edu/story.aspx?id=781
Have been reading this thread with anguish. This is an important issue and needs to be taken up. Need to mention two points.
First, I have written to our Senator, more than a week ago. I know, I should have posted on this forum earlier...my bad!
Second, by way of information, let me also add that here in Georgia, children of legal immigrants get in-state tuition if a 485 has been filed for them. Both my children are paying in-state tuition only. However, this is available in state colleges only, it is evident. I had to submit pay stubs and a letter from employer in lieu of employment verification.
Hope it helps.
http://www.today.colostate.edu/story.aspx?id=781
Have been reading this thread with anguish. This is an important issue and needs to be taken up. Need to mention two points.
First, I have written to our Senator, more than a week ago. I know, I should have posted on this forum earlier...my bad!
Second, by way of information, let me also add that here in Georgia, children of legal immigrants get in-state tuition if a 485 has been filed for them. Both my children are paying in-state tuition only. However, this is available in state colleges only, it is evident. I had to submit pay stubs and a letter from employer in lieu of employment verification.
Hope it helps.